Attachments listed in source PDF: image001.png; image002.png; PubComm_SDewitt_Data Center Zoning_2026.08.27.pdf
Rona
Included email history
1 message- From:
- Sonya sonyadewitt@gmail.com
- Sent:
- Thursday, August 27, 2026 1:41 PM
- To:
- County Planning Commission planningcommission@spokanecounty.org ; Chesney, Scott Scott Chesney
- Subject:
- Spokane County Planning and County Commissioners are NOT listening to your
Constituents.
I am a property owner and business owner on the
West Plains and I am terrified that the
Spokane
County Commissioners are not listening to us, to their
constituents.
I want to focus specifically on the language in the proposed Data Center Zoning Code so that
any ambiguity and all loopholes are eliminated.
This is how big
Data
Centers
will
exploit
their
power and force the
locals
who live here to pay and suffer. I am insisting that you pay
CLOSE ATTENTION TO EVERY SINGLE WORD. If you do not, WE WILL BE HARMED.
Specifically, you must eliminate the following words:
"discretionary,
nonbinding,
infrequent,
occasional."
Nowhere should there be any words like "suggestions or suggested."
All of the
requirements need to identify who, what, when, where and how.
Furthermore, noncompliance
must be verified by outside parties and
hold
penalties.
It
is ridiculous to have the fox monitor
the henhouse so do not allow the wealthy investor shell
company
to make their own
assessments or evaluate their own progress.
A
Conditional Use Permit should not be expected to fix weaknesses that
should
have been
addressed directly in the code. That is an egregious error that will impact the safety and
wellbeing of your constituents' lives and steal the hard earned money they have invested in
their homes and properties.
You
owe them your loyalty and protection, not Corporations, Shell
Companies and billionaires who do not live, nor raise their families here.
Groundwater protection, cumulative impacts, adequate infrastructure, monitoring, reporting
and enforcement should be clear, articulated
requirements,
not something that can be
interpreted differently from one application to the next. There are already many, many cities
that have developed track records and data from current Data Centers that can be used to
evaluate, compare and track compliance with. Also note how prior Data Centers made
promises
they did NOT keep.
Again, who pays the price for that? Do Shell LLCs, the
billionaires, the wealthy investors? No local taxpayers do.
We pay
for fire departments that
will be rushing to put out fires in the 514 acre facility on the West Plains.
Can you imagine what would happen if a fire escaped outside of the concrete walls onto the
kindling dry fields of the West Plains?
Have you driven through the neighborhoods ravaged by
our recent fires here?
The estimate of the damage is ONE BILLION DOLLARS.
Who pays for
that?
People will not be able to get fire insurance policies now and you want to allow Data
Centers to be built here anyway?
Have
you researched what Firefighters Unions now say about Data Centers? Do you know
what their concerns and recommendations are? Who will pay for the Firefighters specialized
equipment and trucks to put out electrical fires? Who trains them, who subsidizes their
salaries?
We do,
not the Corporate Shell Companies.
This is another
obvious, egregious
loophole for the Shell Company.
We, the local taxpayers, subsidize
their investment!
That is
outrageous and an egregious error that needs to be corrected.
The size of the facility and the
risk it poses
to the ENTIRE COUNTY IF IT CAUGHT FIRE NEEDS TO BE INDEMNIFIED
BY
THE
SHELL COMPANY WHO WILL BE MAKING A PROFIT! Add that to the criteria for approval.
As multi-billion-dollar AI facilities increasingly spill into remote locations due to land
and power availability, fire safety dynamics are fundamentally shifting. Both the
regulatory landscape and hands-on response tactics have updated significantly to
handle these massive infrastructure risks and you have not updated your language or
expectations to meet the intense demands.
These are some specific
recommendations for you to do.
1. Stricter Battery Fire Safety Codes
The rapid adoption of massive, high-density Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage
Systems (BESS) inside data centers has forced strict regulatory updates. Local fire
marshals enforce safety rules largely through NFPA 855: Standard for the Installation
of Stationary Energy Storage Systems. [1, 2, 3]
Mandatory Hazard Mitigation Analysis (HMA): Data centers can no longer
claim basic exemptions. They must provide custom, expert-backed HMAs that
explicitly evaluate the risk of thermal runaway and deflagration from battery off-
gassing. [1, 2]
Advanced Early Detection Requirements: Previous code editions limited fire
detection to narrow air-aspirating or radiant-energy-only systems. The current
standard broadens compliance to tie into NFPA 72 (National Fire Alarm and
Signaling Code), explicitly approving thermal-imaging fire detection to catch
cell-level overheating before visible smoke appears. [1, 2, 3]
Thermal Runaway Propagation Prevention (TRPP): New provisions mandate
construction and physical spacing schemes to completely block a battery fire
from cascading cell-to-cell or rack-to-rack. [1, 2]
2. Rural Fire Department Equipment & Operational Upgrades
When hyperscale data centers launch in remote regions, they often outpace the
volunteer fire districts assigned to protect them. An industrial fire requires thousands
of gallons of water per minute—capabilities many small towns lack. In response,
departments are using specific equipment and tech strategies to adapt: [1, 2, 3]
Procuring "Quint" Apparatuses: Rather than maintaining multiple trucks,
smaller departments prioritize Quint fire rigs. These versatile trucks bundle a
fire pump, water tank, hose bed, ground ladder, and aerial ladder into a single
multi-tasking platform.
High-Capacity Flow Equipment: To supply the immense volume of water
required to suppress a major data center cooling or battery failure, departments
are adding hard suction hoses to vacuum water from local natural sources,
paired with pumps that push at least 1,000 to 2,000 gallons per minute.
AI-Based Early Warning Systems: Rather than waiting for a standard phone
call, rural districts are partnering with utilities to utilize advanced tools like 360-
degree cameras. These systems automatically pinpoint coordinates and push
live weather and satellite data straight to responders.
Modernized National Fire Data: Stations are transitioning to the National
Emergency Response Information System (NERIS). This cloud-based network
allows rural departments to swap intelligence and training strategies with large
metropolitan departments that have experience fighting data center fires. [1 , 2,
3, 4, 5]
Who pays for all of this upgrading? At this time, you are forcing the County
taxpayers to pay for it.
We the people are demanding you make the Data
Centers and their investors pay.
Otherwise, you are forcing the citizens to
become the method to ensure the Data Centers maintain their profit margins.
This is patently unfair, inequit
able and inexcusable.
Right now, Avista is trying
to push through their price increases to fund their required expansion into
hydrogen facilities to support AI Data Centers.
Again, they are using the
taxpayers to facilitate profits for AI Centers and that is inexcusable.
Let the
billionaires
pay for their buildings and the infrastructure to support their
company needs.
My
serious concerns are that you have NOT done nearly enough research on the risks posed by
Data Centers.
You
are basing your recommendations from a couple of other departments in
the County.
That is not
enough background or research, especially since Data Centers are so
new and are just now developing track records to see how they have impacted the residents in
their communities and the environment, the resources, notwithstanding the animals in that
jurisdiction.
Another
obvious first criteria for acceptance of any plan from a developer MUST REQUIRE
THEY HAVE A SUBSTANTIVE
TRACK RECORD OF PRIOR BUILDS OF DATA CENTERS! This will
give Spokane County residents and politicians the track record to review their behavior,
compliance and responsiveness to the contract as well as to community needs.
The idea that
Al French allowed a Shell Company that was run out of Arizona who had no physical address
and never built a single Data Center to be considered as a builder here, is mind boggling and
challenges rational thought.
We in this community
demand that any Company, Corporation or
Entity have an established track record of prior builds of Data Centers full stop.
No exceptions.
The Growth Management Act requires counties to include best available science when
developing regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas. This is non-
negotiable and you are legally, ethically and morally responsible for ensuring that the plan you
submit for approval meets those criteria.
This requires you to be specific and detailed in every
aspect to protect our rights, our health, our property, our community and the environment
itself.
It does not require you to create loopholes for large shell corporations representing
billionaires.
You must remain loyal to us, to the people who elected you, as well as to the best interests of
those who did not.
Make no mistake, highly educated professionals, lawyers, scientists,
researchers, reporters, and influencers are watching you and reading EVERY SINGLE WORD
YOU WRITE IN THIS DOCUMENT.
We are
identifying language
in the DRAFT you publicized
that concerns
us
and offering specific
ways to strengthen it.
Pay attention to us!
As many of us have said to you both in writing and in person during your public hearings, we
demand you
close loopholes, define measurable standards and establish real, specific,
tractable
enforcement, with expectations and consequences
before an application is
submitted and before ambiguous language becomes a loophole where our lives are impacted,
we become sick, our pets die, we lose our property value and nothing cannot be corrected.
Saying you are sorry, you didn't know will not be an acceptable excuse.
Remember, you still
live here with us as your neighbors.
We see you at shopping centers, going to the grocery store,
getting gas and in restaurants.
Do you think we will be forgiving when we know you were
explicitly warned and you ignored our needs and instead cowed to the needs and wants of
Shell Companies and billionaires?
You have the opportunity to create an ordinance that is clear, enforceable and protective from
the beginning. Don’t screw it up. Make every word count.
Remember:
WE LIVE HERE, BILLIONAIRES DON'T.
Sonya DeWitt, M.A., L.M.H.C.
509/867-4242
Loading community reactions…